staticbrain.com

CV Rick, Stein & Lanza: Since it was insinuated my 9-11 posts were “damaging to credibility”, “loony”, and “nonsense”, I ask you to study this post thoroughly, watch the videos, and think about all the evidence before you go about disparaging me by name calling, and attempting to shoot my credibility all to hell.

Part 1 of a 3 part response
#1 This is my response to all of you with totally credible evidence by scholars, by defense experts and many others that 9-11 and the governments version of it, and what actually happened are two different things. This response is based on testimony from scholars, from defense experts and many others. Part 1 is in the form of scholastic sites, videos, etc… —————–Let’s get started! Shall we?

#1 Videos, media, websites, etc..

Professor Stephen Jones co-founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth whose membership includes up to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities across the US.

Steven Earl Jones is a professor of physics at Brigham Young University. His research includes nuclear fusion and solar energy. In the 1980s Jones popularized the term cold fusion. Since late 2005, Jones has been defending the hypothesis that the collapse of the World Trade Center was due to a controlled demolition, not terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

9/11 - 2/1/2006 BYU (Brigham Young University) Professor of Physics Steven E Jones WTC (World Trade Center) Lecture at UVSC (Utah Valley State College)

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

Fury as academics claim 9/11 was ‘inside job’
by JAYA NARAIN 6th September 2006

—-excerpt—-

The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an “inside job”, according to a group of leading academics.

Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries

BYU professor in dispute over 9/11 will retire
Jones had been placed on leave 6 weeks ago
By Tad Walch Deseret Morning News (Utah News)
—-excerpt—

“He published a paper saying experiments he conducted at BYU on material from ground zero and other evidence led him to believe the towers fell because pre-set explosives were detonated throughout the buildings after the hijacked jets struck the Twin Towers.”

Who are the scholars for 9/11 Truth? Answer Here

Here are just a few of the many distinguished members on this list:

*Robert M. Bowman (FM)
Who is a Former Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, and a former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions.

*Andreas von Buelow (FM)
Former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years

*David Griscom (FM)
Physics of optical materials, Materials science and engineering, Author/co-author of nearly 200 publications

*Joseph M. Phelps (FM)
MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers

*David Ray Griffin (FM)
Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion & Theology, Claremont School of Theology & Claremont Graduate University Author or editor of some 30 books, including “The New Pearl Harbor” and “The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions” , has made a rare public appearance and a brand-new talk, entitled “9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?”. It will focus on the ethical and spiritual dimension of facing the overwhelming evidence that the Bush Administration was complicit in the attacks of September 11th, 2001.

David Ray Griffin’s Speech University of Wisconsin Madison

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

*James H. Fetzer (FM)
Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, a former Marine Corps officer, author or editor of more than 20 books, and co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth

*Jim Marrs (FM)
Author, Researcher, 9/11, JFK, more

Part 2 of a 3 part response
#2 I am just going to quote a short piece of what CV Rick and Lanza said on my Jim Marrs: 9/11 Truth in 10 Minutes post, and then a piece of what Stein said too on my “Terror Storm by Alex Jones” post, because CV Rick’s thoughts, Stein’s thoughts and Lanza’s match. These quotes will be edited so it doesn’t eat the whole page.

#2 Quotes from CV Rick, Stein and Lanza

CV Rick said:
Static, “This stuff just goes too far . . . First of all, I’m an engineer. I know how buildings are constructed and why and how they collapse.

“What I am going to say is that all this conspiracy B.S. is not productive to the debate on the state of the nation, not supported by actual evidence, and damaging to the credibility of otherwise reasonable people.”

Stein said:
“I’m sorry, I’m just not buying it. I think this sort of thing totally undermines us when we need to speak about ACTUAL bad actions and ACTUAL cover-ups by the U.S. government & corporate interests.”

“PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE let’s focus on a conspiracy that actually took place: … They DIDN’T blow up the twin towers. Saying so justifies the reactionaries in calling us the ‘looney left.’”

Lanza Said:
“Why is it so shocking that a 747 can take down a building built in the 70s by notoriously shoddy mob contractors? What evidence is there to conclude that explosives were set off in the World Trade Center to take it down? Wouldn’t that require the participation of Silverstein Properties? Why would a Manhattan Real Estate investment corporation want to kill thousands of innocent people “many of whom were Wall Street Bankers and Attorneys who they work with?”

“Nonsense”

Part 3 of a 3 part response

#3 My response to all of you:

Why is it that whenever anyone says something about 9-11 lies that the person who hasn’t been educated on the issue always attacks the messengers credibility instead of examining the evidence? “damaging to credibility”, “loony”, and “nonsense”? C’mon you can’t really have said that could you?

This reminds me of the old phrase shoot the messenger!

“Shooting the messenger” is a phrase describing the act of lashing out at the (blameless) bearer of bad news.

In ancient times, messages were delivered in person by a human messenger. Sometimes, in times of war, the messenger would be from the enemy. An easily-provoked recipient would take out his anger on the person delivering the message, literally killing the messenger. In modern usage, the expression refers to any kind of punishment of the person bringing bad news.

Alternative expressions:
* Killing the messenger
* Attacking the messenger
* Blaming the bearer of bad tidings

Anyways, the least you could do is examine the evidence before you get started in on disparaging me by name calling, a form of shooting me and my credibility? No?

Jim Marrs quickly lays out all the main points that demonstrate 9/11 was an inside job planned and executed by the U.S. government. This is raw, public domain interview footage, portions of which appear in the documentary “One Nation Under Siege”

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

Hat Tip To Poetic Justice

Perhaps the victims of hurricane Katrina, many still displaced after more than a year, should trade in FEMA for Hezbollah ( also known as Hizbollah and Hizbu’llah ). Within days of the ceasefire, the so-called terrorist organization Hezbollah is handing out cash to all households that lost their homes to Israel’s bombs.

The group has handed out wads of cash - $12,000 in US banknotes - to hundreds of displaced families in Beirut’s shattered suburbs, and says it will continue distributing funds throughout the country, according to Reuters in an article entitled Lebanese begin rebuilding lives shattered by war By Michael Winfrey

Maybe FEMA should send a delegation to Lebanon to work with Hezbollah and learn the secret of their quick response.

Halliburton to build domestic detention facilities

As the UN demands closure of KBR-built Guantanamo facilities, the Halliburton subsidiary was awarded a $385 million, five-year contract from DHS’s (Department of Homeland Security) US Immigration and Customs Enforcement to build detention facilities within the US. The facilities would house an emergency influx of immigrants, or “support the rapid development of new programs.”

American Concentration Camps

Homeland Security Contracts For Vast New Detention Camps

For those who follow covert government operations abroad and at home, the contract evokes ominous memories of Oliver North’s controversial Rex-84 “readiness exercise bravo 84″ in 1984. This called for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up and detain 400,000 imaginary “refugees,” in the context of “uncontrolled population movements” over the Mexican border into the United States. North’s activities raised civil liberties concerns in both Congress and the Justice Department. The concerns persist.

“Almost certainly this is preparation for a roundup after the next 9/11 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters,” says Daniel Ellsberg, a former military analyst who in 1971 released the Pentagon Papers, the U.S. military’s account of its activities in Vietnam. “They’ve already done this on a smaller scale, with the “special registration” detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo.”

This little bit of information was brought to you by Project Censored and former Congressman Bill Hefner and Pacific News.