staticbrain.com

U.S. FEDERAL LAW allows CHRISTIANS WHO HONOR JESUS to be BEHEADED, with DEATH to be BY DECAPITATION.

Congress and Bush Senior passed law to get your head cut off for blaspheming God by honoring Jesus

MERRY CHRISTMAS and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD.

“Decapitation (from Latin, caput, capitis, meaning head), or beheading, is the removal of a living organism’s head.

Beheading typically refers to the act of intentional decapitation, e.g., as a means of murder or execution; it may be accomplished, for example, with an axe, sword, any kind of wire, or knife, or by means of a guillotine.”

Let’s go back in time to the reign of Bush I, when Congress passed, and Bush signed, Joint House Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14.

In Joint House Resolution 104, the birthday of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, March 26, 1991, was designated as “Education Day, USA.”

Here is HJR 104, Public Law 102-14:

Go to the legislature search site at:
United States of America Legislature Search then choose search bill text then go to select congress near the top and choose 102nd congress then choose enter search word or phrase then choose exact match only and then enter the phrase H.J.RES.104.ENR exactly as written, then underneath that hit search. It will bring up a list of bills. Look for the one that reads as follows: To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.’. (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)[H.J.RES.104.ENR] and click on it. It should be the first one that comes up.

mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-hjr104

Let’s look at the first clause:

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . .

Ah! You think they’re going to mention, perhaps, the great Christian precept “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” or even the Ten Commandments? Or perhaps the principles of liberty espoused by Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, or George Mason? Or quote the words of Thomas Jefferson in a letter to his friend Charles Thompson, dated January 9, 1816, when he said: “I am a real Christian . . . a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus . . .”

Certainly Congress had wonderful material at their fingertips to reaffirm the “ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . . ”

But let’s see what Congress did. Here is the second clause of HJR 104:

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws. . .

Naugahyde Laws? No, that’s not Naugahyde, that’s Noahide . . . Never heard of them! What are they?

WOULD YOU BELIEVE . . .

Explanation No. 1: “Noahide” is the adjectival form of “Noah.” So perhaps God passed down laws to Noah that somehow we overlooked? No, I just scrutinized Genesis in my King James version, and on two Bible Internet search engines. God did not pass down seven laws to Noah, and Noah did not pass down seven laws to anyone else.

Explanation No. 2: Let’s go to a Lubavitcher website — surely they know from where these laws came.

http://www.noahide.com/7laws.htm

mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-7laws

All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.

Let’s try to be logical. Noah lived and died in Genesis. Mt. Sinai is not mentioned in Genesis. Moses lived in Exodus and beyond. God handed over the Ten Commandments to Moses at Mt. Sinai, in Exodus. Therefore God could not have given Noah these laws at Mt. Sinai, for Noah had already died, back in Genesis.

It seems that Bush’s friends, the Lubavitchers, the people who call Jesus a false prophet and idol worshipper, can’t even keep the Bible time-line straight. I wonder what Bush’s pastor would think of Bush lavishing praise on the Lubavitchers?

Explanation No. 3: According to the Encyclopedia Brittanica, the Talmud claims the Noahide laws were given to Adam. “. . . also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind.”

http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=57402&query=noahide

Let’s be realistic. These seven laws which God (allegedly) gave to Adam were never ever written down in the Bible. However, the descendants of Adam passed the laws down verbally to their descendants (”oral law”), and so on and so on . . . until several hundred years after the death of Jesus the Pharisees started writing them down in the Talmud.

If your Grandma told you a story she claimed had been passed down through the family — orally — from the time of Adam, would you believe her? No, of course not. The story is preposterous.

Explanation No. 4: So now let’s turn to the Talmud for an explanation of the Noahide laws. In a footnote to Yebamoth 62a, the Talmud gives the Scriptural source of these seven Noahide laws: “It being one of the seven Noahide commandments. V. Gen. IX, 7.” In Genesis 9:7, God says to Noah: And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.

But as you can see, there is not one mention of seven laws in that verse, despite what the Talmudic sages tell us.

Explanation No. 5: Wait, I’ve overlooked something. Let’s return to the Jews and Hasidic Gentiles (JHG USA) website:

http://www.noahide.com/7laws.htm

mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-7laws

“All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.”

Ah! The operant word is “derived.” The Pharisee scholars derived, or reasoned, the laws into existence. So . . . just as Athena sprang from the head of Zeus, so the Noahide laws sprang from the heads of the Pharisees.

Naugahyde is man-made, vinyl coated-fabric; it is artificial leather. These Noahide laws are man made, Pharisee-coated, artificial laws. As Naugahyde is to leather, so the Noahide Laws are to the Bible.

Explanation 6: This is proof of the pudding: Sanhedrin 56a and 56b says:

The last paragraph of Sanhedrin 56a says “Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social laws; (5) to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and eating flesh cut from a living animal (1) . . .”

Footnote 33, for the above passage, says: “I.e., to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice (Nahmanides on Gen. XXXIV, 13): Hast. Dict. (s.v. Noachian precepts) translates ‘obedience to authority.”

Listen up here, fellow Gentile! “Obedience to authority” is your moral duty. Guess who the “authority” is?

Footnote 34, for the above passage, says: These commandments may be regarded as the foundations of all human and moral progress. Judaism has both a national and a universal outlook in life. In the former sense it is particularistic, SETTING UP A PEOPLE DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM OTHERS (emphasis added) by its peculiar religious law. But in the latter, it recognises that moral progress and its concomitant Divine love and approval are the privilege and obligation of all mankind. And hence the Talmud lays down the seven Noachian precepts, by the observance of which all mankind may attain spiritual perfection, and without which moral death must inevitably ensue. That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . .

Let’s pause here for a moment and notice the phrase I put in emphasis: “… setting up a people distinct and separate from others …”

Now we can put at least some of it together. The rabbis derived the Naugahyde laws from Genesis 9:7, by which they grant to themselves the power to establish courts and demand obedience to their authority from all other races and nations. Later on, in Exodus, God gives Moses the Ten Commandments.

You don’t have to have a triple Ph.D. to figure out that, theologically speaking, laws given by God supersede any laws derived by men. But the Pharisee Talmudists still prefer the laws derived by men (themselves.) That’s why they mention these man-made laws in JHR 104 PL 102-14 and ignore the Ten commandments.

In Footnote 33, the rabbis have granted themselves the authority “. . . to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice . . . translates obedience to authority.” In Footnote 34, ” . . . That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . . ”

Now we see why HJR 104 PL 102-14 did not cite the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments don’t give authority to rabbis to set up courts and rule over the rest of mankind, nor give the rabbis the authority to put to death those who will not follow their dictates.

The Naugahyde laws do exactly that. The purpose of the Naugahyde laws is to establish the supremacy of Jews over others, under pain of death. HJR 104 (PL 102-14) seems to have granted the Naugahyde laws the status of THE fundamental law of the land, only to be tested by the US courts.

But for now visit Lubomyr Prytulak’s Ukranian Archives with me.
In “Education Day USA” Mr. Prytulak points out that the laws, the “Seven occasionally proliferates into 30, or even 66,” and that “Americans may be filled with unease, or even outright trepidation, at some of these laws. Some of the laws are mysterious . . . ” “Some prescribe procedures that are alien to American culture, as execution by beheading, or the necessity of animal sacrifice: “That the court is to administer the death penalty by the sword [i.e., decapitation].” “To offer ritual sacrifices.”

See what he is talking about:
The Noahide Laws List

mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-lawlist

Now the 30 Naugahyde laws prohibit conjurers (Law 25); prohibit consulting with the dead (Law 30), and prohibit eating a limb taken from a living creature (Law 15), prohibit Molech worship (22), but permit the offering of ritual sacrifices (19).

Phew! That’s a relief. We might not be able to live without being permitted to offer ritual sacrifices.

In case you think this is all funny, try this: Rabbinical courts will administer the death penalty by decapitation (Law 16) in the section about courts of justice. That’s not so funny.

MERRY CHRISTMAS and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD.

The one Noahide Law that will surely get a Christian decapitated is the one about blaspheming God. If you worship Jesus and and claim he is the son of God, then according to the Jews you are guilty of blasphemy.

(John 19:5 KJVA) Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man!

(John 19:6 KJVA) When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him.

(John 19:7 KJVA) The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God.

The State of Georgia has alreadyattempted to pass a law for death by guillotine provisions.

A summary of the Georgia Law
HB1274 - Death penalty; guillotine provisions

The above information was copied from Public-Action.com

It is coming and soon. The wholesale slaughter of Christians.

Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

I don’t know about you but I would much rather suffer my head to be struck off than apostasize my faith.

This is only the beginning of what is to come.

Technorati Tags: behead, Bush, decapitation, Noahide, death, Christmas, prophecy, prophecies, religion, apostasy

Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda is a 60-year-old former heroin addict and ex-convict who believes that he is the living incarnation of Jesus Christ. He refers to himself as both Jesus Christ and the Antichrist and exhibits a “666″ tattoo on his forearm. He has millions duped - and they’re running to tattoo parlors to have the number “666″ permanently engraved on their bodies in order to show allegiance to this convict!

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

However, Miranda’s theology doesn’t match up with the REAL Jesus.

According to news about Miranda, “Jesus” makes a six-figure income, drinks, smokes, surrounds himself with gorgeous women, and lives in absolute luxury in his latest incarnation. He sports Rolexes, rides around in expensive cars, and he even has body guards!

What makes this self-proclaimed messiah’s message so enticing?

Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda’s message is basic: “freedom to indulge.” He teaches that:

* The devil, hell, and sin are non-existent,
* Prayer is a waste of time, and
* The Ten Commandments (moral or ethical guidelines) are irrelevant.

His followers believe they are God’s chosen people, predestined for salvation, no matter what they do on earth. As such, all other religions’ teachings are rejected, believing that all other faiths are false and must be destroyed — even when Creciendio en Gracia’s marches result in violent consequences. Miranda esteems himself above Jesus of Nazareth. His responses during interviews are startling: “I am greater than him . . . I teach better than him . . . I won’t die. Even if you tried to kill me! I will be president of the biggest government that this earth has experienced. I’m going to change the whole world.”

Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda is definitely not Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Christ means “anointed one” — consecrated, set apart as holy.

* Jesus Christ fervently believed in praying — especially for others (John 17) and in obedience to God the Father (Hebrews 5:7-8).
* Jesus Christ was not selfish thinking only of himself. He chose to lay down his divine nature and be a human sacrifice, concentrating on God’s broken relationship with man, and died on the cross to repair that relationship, shedding his blood to pay for our sin.
(Hebrews 1:3; 2:14-15)
* Jesus taught with the goal of honoring God (John 7:16-18).

The Bible warns extensively of false teachers, those who practice deception (Matthew 24:4-5, Colossians 2:8, 1 Timothy 4:1-2, 2 Timothy 4:3-4, 2 Peter 2:1-3). The Scriptures also tell of Jesus Christ’s Second Coming to reunite all believers eternally with God (Matthew 16:27, 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18, Revelation 1:7-8). Do not be deceived. Jesus Christ’s divine nature is unchanging. “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever. So do not be attracted by strange, new ideas” (Hebrews 13:8-9).

Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

2Co 11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

1Jn 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (six hundred threescore and six equals 666) (emphasis mine)

Technorati Tags: 666, end times, prophecy, prophecies

Part One of a Series

Easter has traditions that are not as pure and holy as people would like to believe. Many people know nothing of the pagan origins of the holiday. Many people simply do not care to find out the truth. The following should bring some fascinating reading and something to think about, to say the very least.

Origins of Easter:
Easter is one of the most popular religious celebrations in the world. But is it biblical? The word Easter appears only once in the King James Version of the Bible (and not at all in most others). In the one place it does appear, the King James translators mistranslated the Greek word for Passover as “Easter.”

Notice it in Acts 12:4: “And when he [King Herod Agrippa I] had apprehended him [the apostle Peter], he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.”

The Greek word translated Easter here is pascha, properly translated everywhere else in the Bible as “Passover.”

Think about theses facts for a minute. Easter is such a major religious holiday. Yet nowhere in the Bible—not in the book of Acts, which covers several decades of the history of the early Church, nor in any of the epistles of the New Testament, written over a span of 30 to 40 years after Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection—do we find the apostles or early Christians celebrating anything like Easter.

The Encyclopedia Americana says:
“Easter is a convergence of three traditions, (1) Pagan. According to the Venerable Bede, English historian of the early eighth century, the word is derived from the Norse Ostara or Eostare, meaning the festival of spring, at the vernal equinox, when nature is in resurrection after winter. Hence, the rabbits, notable for their fecundity, and the eggs colored like rays of the returning sun, and the northern lights, or aurora borealis.”

And according to the second century historian Eusebius the history is the same. The name of Easter is pagan in origin also. “The Greek ‘pascha’, formed from the Hebrew, is the name of the Jewish festival, applied invariably in the primitive church to designate the festival of the Lord’s resurrection, which took place at the time of the passover. Our word, Easter, is of Saxon origin, … (The church history of Eusebius)

Easter did not become a Christian holiday until the second century after Christ’s death.

End of Part One

Many of us take for granted free speech in the West. However, some troubling legislation has recently touched many free nations including England, Canada and Australia and has threatened to limit that right and awakened citizens to the need for action. This type legislation is now being considered in the U.S.A. as H.R.254, the hate-crimes bill. Christian World News recently conducted an interview with an Australian pastor who was adversely affected by such legislation. Click below to watch this report on Australian Pastor Danny Nalliah.

At the end of the clip, Pastor Nalliah discussed H.R.254, the hate-crimes bill that has been introduced in Congress. What are your opinions on this bill? How do you feel it would negatively or positively affect speech in this country?

Sources: Christian World News and Persecution Blog